Washington and Lee University
UBA Appeal, 1
The University appealed due to penalty not sufficient in a DUI conviction not resulting in suspension. The student did not have a recorded Blood Alcohol Level on record. Outcome: ruled in favor of the student respondent.
UBA Appeal, 2
The student appealed due to extraordinary circumstances and penalty too harsh in a DUI conviction resulting in suspension. The student had a Blood Alcohol Level of .14. The UBA commended the SJC for its ruling but reversed the suspension to a required Leave of Absence from the University due to extraordinary circumstances presented by the accused. Outcome: ruled in favor of the respondent.
UBA Appeal, 3
The student appealed due to unfair process and penalty too harsh in a DUI conviction resulting in suspension. The student had a Blood Alcohol Level of .24. The UBA commended the SJC for its ruling but reversed the suspension due to unfair process. Outcome: ruled in favor of the respondent.
UBA Appeal, 4
The University appealed due to penalty not sufficient in a drunk in public complaint. Outcome: ruled in favor of the complainant.
UBA Appeal, 5
The University appealed due to penalty not sufficient in a DUI conviction not resulting in suspension. The student had a recorded Blood Alcohol Level on .16. Outcome: ruled in favor of the complainant.
UBA Appeal, 6
The University appealed due to penalty not sufficient in a drunk in public complaint. Outcome: ruled in favor of the complainant.
UBA Appeal, 7
The University appealed due to penalty not sufficient in a DUI conviction not resulting in suspension. The student had a recorded Blood Alcohol Level on .18. Outcome: ruled in favor of the complainant.
